WEKO3
アイテム
A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000926
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000926f3cebc43-68e1-4854-9c52-0df41fb53fd6
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
A_Verification_of_Alternative_Assessment_using_Principal_Component_Analysis_based_on_Case_Studies_of_the_Japan_International_Cooperation_Agency (994.8 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2015-05-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | alternative assessment | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | principal component analysis | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | case studies | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Japan International Cooperation Agency | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | public involvement | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18884/00000926 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Kamijo, Tetsuya
× Kamijo, Tetsuya |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Prior research suggested that principal component analysis was effective as an alternative assessment technique in terms of clarity of reasons for selecting the most suitable option, low arbitrariness, verification of analysis results and easiness of technique. This study aimed to apply this analysis to the 15 cases of alternative assessment that the Japan International Cooperation Agency prepared, in order to verify the adequacy of a regular assessment methodology. Some options selected were the same as options selected by regular techniques and other options were different. The reasons would be criteria setting with a high correlation, arbitrary weighting and evaluation, and summation using scores not normalized. The principal component analysis could deal with the above-mentioned problems and be a recommended alternative assessment technique and a preferable number of alternatives and criteria could be six and ten at the minimum. Finally, this paper proposed to use this analysis as a second assessment technique to verify the result of an alternative analysis with summation using normalized scores. Further case studies are required to find an appropriate alternative assessment methodology including public involvement and establishing correct criteria and right alternatives. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of Environmental Information Science en : Journal of Environmental Information Science 巻 43, 号 5, p. 31-38, 発行日 2015-05-01 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Center for Environmental Information Science | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 03896633 | |||||
