{"created":"2023-05-15T12:55:53.541406+00:00","id":936,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"e5f1412a-20cd-41d0-a85e-5200ce5e9d7a"},"_deposit":{"created_by":18,"id":"936","owners":[18],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"936"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:jicari.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000936","sets":["602","602:631"]},"author_link":["1302"],"item_10001_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2015-05-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"5","bibliographicPageEnd":"38","bibliographicPageStart":"31","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"43","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"Journal of Environmental Information Science "},{"bibliographic_title":"Journal of Environmental Information Science ","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10001_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Prior research suggested that principal component analysis was effective as an\nalternative assessment technique in terms of clarity of reasons for selecting the most suitable\noption, low arbitrariness, verification of analysis results and easiness of technique. This study\naimed to apply this analysis to the 15 cases of alternative assessment that the Japan\nInternational Cooperation Agency prepared, in order to verify the adequacy of a regular\nassessment methodology. Some options selected were the same as options selected by regular\ntechniques and other options were different. The reasons would be criteria setting with a high\ncorrelation, arbitrary weighting and evaluation, and summation using scores not normalized.\nThe principal component analysis could deal with the above-mentioned problems and be a\nrecommended alternative assessment technique and a preferable number of alternatives and\ncriteria could be six and ten at the minimum. Finally, this paper proposed to use this analysis\nas a second assessment technique to verify the result of an alternative analysis with\nsummation using normalized scores. Further case studies are required to find an appropriate\nalternative assessment methodology including public involvement and establishing correct\ncriteria and right alternatives.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10001_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.18884/00000926","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10001_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"Center for Environmental Information Science"}]},"item_10001_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"03896633","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Kamijo, Tetsuya","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1302","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-06-14"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"A_Verification_of_Alternative_Assessment_using_Principal_Component_Analysis_based_on_Case_Studies_of_the_Japan_International_Cooperation_Agency.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"994.8 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_8","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"A_Verification_of_Alternative_Assessment_using_Principal_Component_Analysis_based_on_Case_Studies_of_the_Japan_International_Cooperation_Agency","url":"https://jicari.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/936/files/A_Verification_of_Alternative_Assessment_using_Principal_Component_Analysis_based_on_Case_Studies_of_the_Japan_International_Cooperation_Agency.pdf"},"version_id":"a7053298-2945-4b5f-81de-8c0d6937f9ba"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"alternative assessment","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"principal component analysis","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"case studies","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Japan International Cooperation Agency","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"public involvement","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"journal article","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency"},{"subitem_title":"A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10001","owner":"18","path":["602","631"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2015-05-01"},"publish_date":"2015-05-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"936","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["A Verification of Alternative Assessment using Principal Component Analysis based on Case Studies of the Japan International Cooperation Agency"],"weko_creator_id":"18","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T13:11:12.539156+00:00"}