WEKO3
アイテム
Does a Rural Road Improvement Project Contribute to Inclusive Growth?–A Case Study from Bangladesh
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000794
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000794c27e4135-e931-47a5-9165-3d114c04930b
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
JICA-RI_WP_No_138.pdf (528.6 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 報告書 / Research Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-02-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Does a Rural Road Improvement Project Contribute to Inclusive Growth?–A Case Study from Bangladesh | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | inclusive growth | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | impact analysis | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | rural infrastructure | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Bangladesh | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws | |||||
| 資源タイプ | research report | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18884/00000794 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 報告年度 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2017-02-01 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
| 著者 |
Fujita, Yasuo
× Fujita, Yasuo |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The concept of “Inclusive growth,” which has increasingly been used in the international arena, is concerned with both the pace and pattern of growth (i.e., the income growth of both poor and non-poor, non-income poverty and inequality). Developing countries and donors have often considered rural roads to have a positive impact on the growth of the rural economy and poverty reduction, through the promotion of better connectivity. This paper analyzes the impact of a rural road improvement project on inclusive growth in Bangladesh using a difference-in-difference method based on panel data from a large household survey. The results show that the project did contribute to the growth of the average income in the project area, and therefore to the inclusive growth at the national level. However this was mainly because of the income growth of households other than the poorest. In particular, the poor households with inferior initial resource endowments in landholding and household occupation did not benefit from the project. Thus, rural road projects are not necessarily inclusive at household level, though project specific factors should carefully be considered. A policy implication is that a rural road project in a poor rural area does not always benefit the poorest; hence complimentary interventions for these poorest households are needed. | |||||
| 号 | ||||||
| 号 | Woriking Paper;138 | |||||
