WEKO3
アイテム
The Motivation of Participants in Successful Development Aid Projects: A Self-Determination Theory Analysis of Reasons for Participating
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000777
https://doi.org/10.18884/000007776ce44939-8a08-4706-891d-babf5e2648c4
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Item type | 報告書 / Research Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2016-03-16 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The Motivation of Participants in Successful Development Aid Projects: A Self-Determination Theory Analysis of Reasons for Participating | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | development aid | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | capacity development projects | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | motivation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | self-determination theory | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws | |||||
資源タイプ | research report | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18884/00000777 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
報告年度 | ||||||
日付 | 2016-03-16 | |||||
日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
著者 |
Sayanagi, Nobuo R
× Sayanagi, Nobuo R× Aikawa, Jiro |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The aim of this study was to reveal the reasons that extension officers and farmers give for participating in successful capacity development projects, and to categorize these reasons into motivation types defined by self-determination theory, drawing from the “why questions” approach of Chandler & Connell (1987). Field officers and farmers from two successful projects, — namely, the Life Improvement Approach in Japan and the Smallholder Horticulture Empowerment and Promotion approach in Kenya — participated in semi-structured interviews regarding the reasons they participated in their projects’ activities. The concordance rate of the independent ratings of the reasons by the two authors was high, verifying the reliability of the coding procedure. A large proportion of the reasons were coded as identified/integrated regulation, the most autonomous type of motivation, supporting the hypothesis that participants of successful aid projects would primarily be autonomously motivated. Other implications of the interview transcripts are also discussed. | |||||
号 | ||||||
号 | Working Paper;121 |