ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. (-FY2017) Growth and Poverty Reduction
  2. The Second East Asian Miracle?: Political Economy of Asian Responses to the 1997/98 and 2008/09 Crises

A Tale of Two Crises: Indonesia’s Political Economy

https://doi.org/10.18884/00000660
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000660
065920d8-7990-4136-b01a-257929a772d3
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
JICA-RI_WP_No.57_2013.pdf JICA-RI_WP_No.57_2013.pdf (715.0 kB)
license.icon
Item type 報告書 / Research Paper(1)
公開日 2013-03-25
タイトル
タイトル A Tale of Two Crises: Indonesia’s Political Economy
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Indonesia
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Asian Financial Crisis
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Global Financial Crisis
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws
資源タイプ research report
ID登録
ID登録 10.18884/00000660
ID登録タイプ JaLC
報告年度
日付 2013-03-25
日付タイプ Issued
著者 Basri, Muhammad Chatib

× Basri, Muhammad Chatib

WEKO 759

en Basri, Muhammad Chatib

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The global financial crisis caused major economic problems in many countries. Indonesia was obviously affected by this crisis; its export growth declined significantly. Nevertheless, the impact of the crisis on the Indonesian economy was relatively limited compared to other countries in the region, including Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. This situation leads to the question of why was the impact of the global crisis on the Indonesian economy relatively limited? This was, after all, not the first time that Indonesia had experienced a financial crisis. In 1998, the Asian financial crisis had a very bad effect on Indonesia. An interesting question to ask is why the effects of the 2008 global financial crisis, which in terms of magnitude was much larger than the 1998 crisis, were relatively limited? This paper argues there are, at least, four differences between the 1998 crisis and the 2008 crisis: the origin of the crisis, the exchange rate regime, policy responses and the overall political economy situation. In addition, this paper argues that the structure of trade played an important role in the 2008 crisis. Indonesia survived the global financial crisis thanks to two factors: good policy and good luck. While highlighting these factors, this paper focuses primarily on the role of Indonesia’s domestic political economy during these two crises. Lest it leaves an unduly optimistic picture of Indonesia’s economic future, the paper closes with an assessment of several major hurdles that Indonesia must deal with in the coming years.
号
号 Working Paper;57
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 13:07:52.424998
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3