WEKO3
アイテム
Is GBS Still a Preferable Aid Modality?
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000653
https://doi.org/10.18884/000006533e595d9f-c8ae-458c-94d2-95ee47fd838e
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
JICA-RI_WP_No.50_2013_2.pdf (581.9 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 報告書 / Research Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-01-09 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Is GBS Still a Preferable Aid Modality? | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | General Budget Support | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | fungibility | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | intergovernmental transfer | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | aid modality | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | complementarity | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws | |||||
| 資源タイプ | research report | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18884/00000653 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 報告年度 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2013-01-09 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
| 著者 |
Furukawa, Mitsuaki
× Furukawa, Mitsuaki× Takahata, Junichiro |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper attempts to assess the effect of General Budget Support (GBS) in developing countries by using panel data on government revenue, expenditure, and social indicators for the 10-year period from 1997 to 2006. We focus on the health sector as a representative social sector. The results show that GBS in fact increases the budget allocation for the health sector more than tax revenue does. However, the effect of government health expenditure on health indicators is not necessarily improved by the introduction of GBS, which indicates that the introduction of GBS alone has limited impact. The paper suggests that the complementarity between GBS and projects/programs focusing on human and institutional capacity development should be seriously considered. | |||||
| 号 | ||||||
| 号 | Working Paper;50 | |||||
