WEKO3
アイテム
Motives behind Community Participation
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000616
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000616a4db6b11-7cfd-4140-b6e3-ba5ba5042916
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
JICA-RI_WP_No.16_2010.pdf (389.4 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 報告書 / Research Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-06-19 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Motives behind Community Participation | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Community participation | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Social capital | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Network formation | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Risk sharing | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws | |||||
| 資源タイプ | research report | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18884/00000616 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他（別言語等）のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Evidence from Natural and Field Experiments in a Developing Country | |||||
| 報告年度 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2010-06-19 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
| 著者 |
Shoji, Masahiro
× Shoji, Masahiro× Aoyagi, Keitaro× Kasahara, Ryuji× Sawada, Yasuyuki |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This study tests alternative hypotheses concerning the motivations behind the participation by rural households in community work. Using unique data from natural and field experiments in southern Sri Lanka, where irrigated fields have been allocated to farmers by government lottery, we compare quantitatively five possible motives behind community participation: public goods investment, general social capital accumulation, production network formation, risk sharing network formation, and pure altruism. Our empirical results show that community participation patterns are consistent with social capital accumulation behavior to form risk sharing networks. Only a few studies have investigated empirically the process of social capital formation, and our analysis fills the gap in the literature. Our findings also suggest the possibility of a poverty trap: facing negative shocks, poor households may have difficulty in finding time for social capital accumulation and risk sharing network formation; this, in turn, may cause them to become more vulnerable and even poorer. | |||||
| 号 | ||||||
| 号 | Working Paper;16 | |||||
