WEKO3
アイテム
State Building in Fragile Situations: Japanese Aid Experiences in Cambodia, Afghanistan and Mindanao
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000605
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000605bb2293b3-6b4e-4bd2-95e6-6fd552921696
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
JICA-RI_WP_No.5_2010.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 報告書 / Research Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-03-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | State Building in Fragile Situations: Japanese Aid Experiences in Cambodia, Afghanistan and Mindanao | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Cambodia | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | state-building | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | fragile states | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | conflict | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws | |||||
| 資源タイプ | research report | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18884/00000605 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 報告年度 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2010-03-01 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
| 著者 |
Murotani, Ryutaro
× Murotani, Ryutaro× Wakamatsu, Eiji× Kikuchi, Tomonori× Nagaishi, Masafumi× Ochiai, Naoyuki |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | After the 1991 Paris Peace Agreement, Cambodia set about the difficult process of state-building. Despite violent clashes in 1997-98, the Cambodian government has been largely successful in establishing full control of military forces, into which former Khmer Rouge soldiers have been reintegrated. The Cambodian government, with support of donors, successfully improved infrastructure throughout the country, built up capacity in key state institutions, and provided basic public services to the people. Behind these achievements was assistance from a grassroots network built by the Cambodian People‟s Party (CPP) in the 1980s. This network is characterized by patronage connections between the government and village chiefs, and between the latter and villagers. Consequently, the legitimacy of the state has been strengthened. In contrast, social empowerment has been delayed, and people's political rights and freedoms have been restricted by the state. As shown by the recent increase of corruption charges and land tenure disputes, the imbalance between the powerful state and a stunted civil society is a potential factor of instability. | |||||
| 号 | ||||||
| 号 | Working Paper;5 | |||||
