ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. Global Environment

Development of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China: How can public participation play its role beyond environmental authoritarianism?

https://doi.org/10.18884/00001082
https://doi.org/10.18884/00001082
02910048-1b6f-4c70-9a02-6db905f11430
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
Research Research Paper No.2 (2.3 MB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2023-04-03
タイトル
タイトル Development of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China: How can public participation play its role beyond environmental authoritarianism?
タイトル
タイトル Development of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China: How can public participation play its role beyond environmental authoritarianism?
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Environmental governance
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 authoritarianism
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 environmental public interest litigation
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 spillover effect
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 China
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 Environmental governance
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 authoritarianism
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 environmental public interest litigation
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 spillover effect
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 China
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.18884/00001082
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 Otsuka, Kenji

× Otsuka, Kenji

WEKO 1644

Otsuka, Kenji

ja-Kana Otsuka, Kenji

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 China is well known as one of the longest-standing authoritarian countries ruled by a Communist party in the world. Nevertheless, both non-participatory and participatory approaches to decision making in environmental governance can be observed under this form of regime. How then can we identify their combinations in China’s environmental governance? In exploring this question, this study focuses on the recent development of environmental public interest litigation (EPIL) cases after the enactment of the revised Environmental Protection Law (EPL) in 2015, and tests the pro-authoritarianism assumption, “non-environmental spillover effects,” as a characteristic of Chinese “environmental authoritarianism” raised by earlier writers. Looking into the recent development of EPIL cases by NGOs and procuratorates carefully, it can be concluded that a kind of division of work between NGOs and procuratorates stipulated in the revised EPL could restrain authoritarian spillover effects, although there are disproportionately increasing numbers of cases by procuratorates than NGOs. Also, there are some cases where NGOs and procuratorates cooperate in EPILs. Furthermore, local NGOs can mobilize numerous volunteers in this process. The experience and knowledge accumulated among the broader group of locals in the country might bring an “environmental spillover effect,” which means a spillover toward pro-environmental democracy, to push EPIL reform toward a more participation-friendly style of involvement.
書誌情報 Research Paper
en : Research Paper

号 Research Paper No.2, p. 1-24, 発行日 2023-04-03
出版者
出版者 JICA Research Institute
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 12:58:06.743154
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3