ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. Others
  1. Others
  2. 開発協力文献レビュー

Qualitative Research is not a Unified Paradigm: Implications for the Evaluation of Qualitative Research Studies

https://doi.org/10.18884/00001050
https://doi.org/10.18884/00001050
7122d9a7-6705-497e-9cd1-e7a416ab580c
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
JICA-RI_Literature_Review_No.15.pdf JICA-RI_Literature_Review_No.15 (1.1 MB)
license.icon
Item type 一般雑誌記事 / Article(1)
公開日 2021-08-31
タイトル
タイトル Qualitative Research is not a Unified Paradigm: Implications for the Evaluation of Qualitative Research Studies
タイトル
タイトル Qualitative Research is not a Unified Paradigm: Implications for the Evaluation of Qualitative Research Studies
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ article
ID登録
ID登録 10.18884/00001050
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 Fushimi, Katsutoshi

× Fushimi, Katsutoshi

WEKO 1574

en Fushimi, Katsutoshi

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Qualitative research is very popular in social science. When compared with quantitative research
studies, the common characteristics seen among qualitative research studies stand out. Nonetheless,
when the philosophical and methodologi cal foundations of the latter are examined carefully, their
variations surface. Qualitative research is not a unified paradigm. The current paper reviews the
literature on research paradigms in social science and based on this review presents four implicat ions
regarding the evaluation of qualitative research studies. These are: (1) the necessity for divergent
evaluation criteria, (2) the importance of a clear indication of the researchers’ paradigm, (3) the
possibility of a single criterion, and (4) the imp racticality of setting evaluation criteria. These
implications are contradictory. This incompatibility reflects the complexity of establishing evaluation
criteria for qualitative research studies and the diversity of these studies. At the end, the paper al so
provides an implication for researchers in international development studies (IDS). Namely, the IDS
researchers should be self reflexive in the research paradigm of their own studies.
書誌情報 開発協力文献レビュー
en : Literature Review

号 15, p. 1-19, 発行日 2021-08-31
出版者
出版者 JICA Ogata Sadako Research Institute for Peace and Development
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 12:59:35.008085
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3