WEKO3
アイテム
The Impact of Microcredit on Agricultural Technology Adoption and Productivity: Evidence from Randomized Control Trial in Tanzania
https://doi.org/10.18884/00000997
https://doi.org/10.18884/0000099758961ecc-6e45-4f83-bbfe-0565e9f56b39
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2019-06-20 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The Impact of Microcredit on Agricultural Technology Adoption and Productivity: Evidence from Randomized Control Trial in Tanzania | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The Impact of Microcredit on Agricultural Technology Adoption and Productivity: Evidence from Randomized Control Trial in Tanzania | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Microcredit | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Technology Adoption | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Agriculture | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Tanzania | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Africa | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Microcredit | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Technology Adoption | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Agriculture | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Tanzania | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Africa | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18884/00000997 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
Nakano, Yuko
× Nakano, Yuko× Magezi, Eustadius F. |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper examines the impact of microcredit on the adoption of technology and productivity of rice cultivation in Tanzania. Collaboratively with BRAC, a globally-known microfinance institution, we offered microcredit specifically designed for agriculture to randomly selected farmers. We estimate the intention-to-treat effect (ITT) as well as the local average treatment effect (LATE) of microcredit, by using the eligibility to the program as an instrumental variable (IV). Overall, we find statistically weak or even null evidence that the BRAC program increases the use of chemical fertilizer. Also, credit use does not result in an increase in paddy yield, profit from rice cultivation, or household income for borrowers. Our results from sub-sample analyses suggest that credit does not increase the fertilizer use by those who have better access to irrigation water as they have already applied the amount of fertilizer near to the recommended level. On the other hand, credit increases the fertilizer use by those who have limited access to irrigation water and have previously used little fertilizer. However, possibly due to the poor yield response to fertilizer, the increase in chemical fertilizer use does not result in higher yield for them. We also observed similar phenomenon for the comparison between trained and non-trained borrowers before the intervention. | |||||
書誌情報 |
Working Paper en : Working Paper 号 193, p. 1-41, 発行日 2019-06-20 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | JICA Rsearch Institute |